<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the tide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/</link>
	<description>..and mastering the art of Soulbuilding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:38:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terraflora</title>
		<link>http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>terraflora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>A) Wouldn&#039;t that, by your definition, mean all memories would be  deemed &#039;good&#039;?  OR.. Perhaps not.  Perhaps then .. it is simply Curiosity and Inquiry! Open and unbiased.
  Maybe the question is - Can &quot;soft eyes&quot; see truth that is sad and unfortunate?
B) Do I seem to be seeing only the bitterness?  I hope that I am remaining curious and willing to engage with ... that mysterious meaning-making process within.  I&#039;m just arguing with it &#039;out loud&#039; perhaps.  :}
Certainly what I see as my challenge is .. well on one hand, impossible: to maintain the &lt;em&gt; original&lt;/em&gt; innocence of the memories - to keep them unsullied by current knowledge.   Not possible, in honesty.  SO..  this simply represents a new letting go, another &#039;little death&#039; in the process.
Brightfeather, thanks for stopping in. I deeply honor your presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A) Wouldn&#8217;t that, by your definition, mean all memories would be  deemed &#8216;good&#8217;?  OR.. Perhaps not.  Perhaps then .. it is simply Curiosity and Inquiry! Open and unbiased.<br />
  Maybe the question is &#8211; Can &#8220;soft eyes&#8221; see truth that is sad and unfortunate?<br />
B) Do I seem to be seeing only the bitterness?  I hope that I am remaining curious and willing to engage with &#8230; that mysterious meaning-making process within.  I&#8217;m just arguing with it &#8216;out loud&#8217; perhaps.  :}<br />
Certainly what I see as my challenge is .. well on one hand, impossible: to maintain the <em> original</em> innocence of the memories &#8211; to keep them unsullied by current knowledge.   Not possible, in honesty.  SO..  this simply represents a new letting go, another &#8216;little death&#8217; in the process.<br />
Brightfeather, thanks for stopping in. I deeply honor your presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brightfeather</title>
		<link>http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>brightfeather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terraflora.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/return-of-the-tide/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>There are two ways to look at memories and then move forward. If you focus on discerning every bitter deail of a bad memory then you are using your &quot;hard eyes&quot;. If you choose to enjoy the sweetness of a good memory then you are using  your &quot;soft eyes&quot;. Now suppose you decided to view all memories, both good and bad ones with your &quot;soft eyes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two ways to look at memories and then move forward. If you focus on discerning every bitter deail of a bad memory then you are using your &#8220;hard eyes&#8221;. If you choose to enjoy the sweetness of a good memory then you are using  your &#8220;soft eyes&#8221;. Now suppose you decided to view all memories, both good and bad ones with your &#8220;soft eyes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
